Sunday, May 8, 2011

An Interesting Link

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Remember World Trade Center 7

Here's the new ad about to be aired on television. Visit and

Friday, March 25, 2011

Stanley Praimnath & Brian Clark

These two guys are famous 9/11 survivors. Mr. Praimnath watched one of the jets come into the tower from a very unique and singular point of view...directly at him. According to his testimony the jet came directly at him and ultimately sliced right into his office while he hid under his desk "20 feet away". In an interview with National Geographic Mr. Praimnath does not neglect to interject that he "saw a giant 'U' on the plane". I was just wondering where that giant 'U' was actually located on the plane and how he saw it from his unique perspective. It seems to me that all he would be able to see would be a nosecone and the leading edge of the wings. Especially if the plane is rocketing directly at you at 500 mph.
Another interesting point is that we are to believe that the jet fuel explosion was so hot that it weakened all of the massive steel support columns, and yet Mr. Prainmath escaped a direct hit, only "20 feet away" without any burns.
Later, as these two "eye witnesses" had narrowly escaped the burning building and were fleeing down the street, Brian Clark turns to Stanley and told him, "that building's coming down". And, in his own words, he admits "I don't know why I said that", but he did. Somehow he just had a hunch.
National Geographic now strikes me as one of the most obvious propaganda machines around. Just like religion, people are so quick to attach themselves to what "scientists" declare that they forget to do any thinking on their own. As far as I'm concerned the blind masses that unquestioningly follow the ever changing scientific "facts" are no different than those who stumble along after the religion of the week as if in an intoxicated stupor.
It is important to remember that the scientific community is seeking after facts. And the more research that is done on a subject, the more that is revealed. Everybody knows that knowledge on most any topic evolves with time. As new discoveries are made and as technology advances, we are often able to find that what was commonly accepted a decade ago as scientific fact has now been completely abandoned. Remember that, all of you who declare with such arrogance that "scientists have proven" this or that. Your National Geographic channel has an agenda and receives money from somewhere to create these documentaries.
Ask questions!

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

"Dead dolphins in Gulf: scientists seek explanation" -- Huh!?!

Oh...This is Rich! I just ran into this article on Fox News.

"GULFPORT, Miss. – Scientists say five dead baby dolphins have been found on two islands in the northern Gulf of Mexico, adding to what they say is an unusually high tally of dead dolphins in recent months off Mississippi and Alabama.
Researchers say they're seeking clues as to what caused the deaths. They report that 28 dolphins of all ages have been found dead in waters off the two states since the start of 2011, compared with 89 dead dolphins in all of 2010.
Moby Solangi, director of the nonprofit Institute for Marine Mammal Studies in Gulfport, says scientists have taken tissue samples in hopes of solving the mystery.
But scientists say they've ruled out possible effects from last summer's enormous oil rig spill off Louisiana."

--You see? Scientists have already ruled it out, so, there you go. Don't worry, scientists have everything figured out, and, along with various presidential administrations and summits, things are well under control. Now, go back to sleep.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

National Geographic Propaganda Program

The National Geographic channel has recently aired a whole string of 9/11 documentaries which perpetuate the official lie. Both 'How It Was' and '9/11: Science and Conspiracy' conveniently omit any reference to the smoking gun...WTC 7! In '9/11: Science and Conspiracy', the producers introduce the piece as an objective pitting of "conspiracy theorists" against science (As if these were the two polar opposites). They proceed with an experiment to find out if jet fuel is capable of reaching temperatures that can deform a steel beam. And, of course, it did. The trouble is, the beam they used was admittedly much much smaller than the actual support columns in WTC 1 & 2. As a welder, I can tell you that heat displacement varies enormously depending upon 1.) the thickness of the steel and 2.) the grade of steel. Different kinds of steel behave in different ways. The same temperature that may contort a piece of 1/8th inch angle iron will do absolutely nothing to the shape of a piece of 1 inch angle iron. So the experiment was a wash to begin with.
Next they offer up a research project by Purdue University by which we are to learn that the impact of the jet into the building can actually cause it to collapse. I'll not bother at this point to elaborate on the scientific facts offered by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on this subject - You can watch this for yourself on several videos to be found here on my blog. However, an interesting point of research - The federal government has funded Purdue Universities science department for years. They receive very large amount of money from Big Brother, and as we know, it is not wise to bite the hand that feeds you.
World Trade Center 7 fell into its own footprint at an accelerating free fall speed nearly 7 hours after the first two towers fell and it wasn't hit by anything but some debris. THE FACT THAT ANYBODY EVEN HAS TO SPELL THIS PHENOMENON OUT TO ANYBODY IS COMPLETELY ABSURD! And yet, most Americans just don't bother to question this.
I guess, ultimately, we get the kind of government we deserve.
National Geographic has, apparently, been bought...Is anyone surprised?

WTC 7 - Fight for the Truth!

What Is The Piece of Equipment on the Bottom of Flight 175?

How You Spend Your Dollar Speaks Louder Than Your Vote

In these dangerous times in which we now live it is more important than ever that we DO NOT endorse any person, company, organization, etc. with our spent dollar. It is my belief that our vote in this country is relatively impotent least at higher levels. Our Federal Government is tightly woven into the fabric of Big Business and Corporate Authority. Therefore, the tyranny will thrive as long as we feed the machine with our money. Be wise. Think before you spend. Who do you endorse? We need to practice strategic, tactical spending now. Don't support Monsanto. Don't support the massive pharmaceutical empire. Don't support government subsidized GMO crops. Do the research and cast your vote at the cash register!