Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Kissinger Quote

"Today America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by the World Government.” - Henry Kissinger 1991 Bilderberg Conference.

Senator William Jenner Is Quoted

“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… The important point to remember about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps, forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a collectivist one-party state. It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without suspecting that change is under way… If I seem to be extremist, the reason is that this revolutionary clique cannot be understood, unless we accept the fact that they are extremist. It is difficult for people governed by reasonablenss and morality to imagine the existence of a movement which ignores reasonableness and boasts of its determination to destroy; which ignores morality, and boasts of its cleverness in outwitting its opponents by abandoning all scruples. This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.”

Senator William Jenner of Indiana (1954)

Monday, April 12, 2010

Take A Look At Your America!

Disclaimer #1 - There are a couple of scenes toward the beginning of this clip of torture that will certainly be objectionable to some viewers (at about 1:42 - 2:03). I debated including this video on my blog because of it, but I feel that the message of this clip is solid enough and compelling enough to justify posting it. I apologize to any and all who may be offended, but sometimes we have to take a hard look at the ugliness taking place in our own front yards.
Disclaimer #2 - The cliche "ominous" soundtrack is unfortunate, but again, the message of the piece is important - please disregard the soundtrack if that sort of tactic bothers you.

Friday, April 9, 2010

One Meaningful Campaign: Our Government Makes Use of Their Time & Our Tax Dollars

"Freedom fries" was a euphemism for French fries used by some conservatives in the United States as a result of anti-French sentiment in that country during the international debate over the decision to launch the 2003 invasion of Iraq. France had expressed strong opposition in the United Nations to such an invasion. The French position was frowned upon by some in the United States, leading to campaigns for the boycotting of French goods and businesses and the removal of the country's name from products.
On March 11, 2003, Representatives Robert W. Ney (R-Ohio) and Walter B. Jones, Jr. (R-North Carolina) declared that all references to French fries and French toast on the menus of the restaurants and snack bars run by the House of Representatives would be removed. House cafeterias were ordered to rename French fries to "freedom fries". This action was carried out without a congressional vote, under the authority of Ney's position as Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, which oversees restaurant operations for the chamber. The simultaneous renaming of French toast to "freedom toast" attracted less attention.
In May 2005, Representative Jones, having arrived at the belief that the United States went to war "with no justification", said of the "freedom fries" episode: "I wish it had never happened." By July 2006, the House had changed the name of the two foods in all of its restaurants back to "French fries" and "French toast".


You and I paid for this nonsense!!!

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

This Is What Blind Allegiance Looks Like

Aside from the textbook P.R. opportunity and the attempt at a sickeningly sweet yet generic sentiment - aside from playing the "ethnic" card (smart move)- lets take a closer look at something -
There are over 309 million people in America, 3 million of whom were working at getting supporting signatures resulting in only 1.1 million who signed (telling numbers, indeed). This means that if all 3 million approached just one person each, then nearly 2/3 DID NOT support the bill and DID NOT sign...(math is fun!!) Rather than exhibiting an impressive number of supporting signatures, which is the obvious intent of this clip, Obamites have shot themselves in the foot...the math here indicates that around 66% of those approached DID NOT support Obamas plan. And this excludes the likelihood that 1.1 million of those signatures were those of the 3 million working on the project. Wow, what an embarrassment!
Aside from all of these things, please note the hysteria that is so common among the die-hard Obama supporters. This phenomenon is indicative of the mindless loyalty to a larger-than-life rockstar persona which is all too effective among those so eager to cling to an "image". Especially the young. -- "from the second he walks in the room it's just, I don't know, you feel it."
It calls to mind black and white clips of The Beatles' first arrival in America, or herds of girls fainting as Elvis once shook his moneymaker.
Take a look at what blind allegiance looks like...